Sign in or Register Home
DiamondRing.com Logo DiamondRing.comYour Online Jewelry Shopping Network  
 
View Latest Products View Posts Ask Us Ask our Network Jewelers for a quote on a diamond/gemstone/jewelry



Diamond Search













Recent Entries

DiamondBlog.com is back!

DiamondBlog is coming back soon!

A9 releases awesome map tool

The New DeBeers Store

50 Carat Graf Diamond

Mystery of Hope Diamond Solved

A Planet full of Diamonds?

Is Google developing their own browser?

Interfax: Yakutia boosts cut diamond output 150% in 9 mths

Interfax: MinFin close to declassifying diamond data

Express India: Diamond workers to get rating cards

IPP Media: Shinyanga turns into haven of illegal diamond trafficking

Diamonds in the news: Victoria Secret Bra

The Apprentice: Launching Trump's new Jewelry Line

BusinessWire: Wal-Mart number on Jewelry Retailer

iAfrica: Tiffany takes on DeBeers

StockLemon.com: “Diamonds are Forever”, but Stock Promotions “Die Another Day”

Jewelry Consumer Opinion Council

Ivana Trump: Jewelry Collection and Reality Show

TACY: LVMH WATCHES AND JEWELRY SALES UP 6%

JCK: Belgian diamond bourses launches quality label

All Africa: Govt to Finalise Memo On Gemstone Authority

Hindustan Times: The necklace that Joan Rivers wore for the post-Oscar 2004 party is now creating ripples in the city.

India Info Line: For large players like us the policy is neutral: Classic Diamonds

Stockwatch.com: CMKM Diamonds the subject of aborted radio debate

NPR: From the Kalahari to Malibu

The Journal News: Rockland jewelers make convertible jewelry

PR Newswire: Kensington Resources Ltd.: Aggressive 2004 Drilling Program Commences at Fort a la Corne

Tacy: ANDRE LOUW APPOINTED CHAIRMAN OF DIAMOND CORE

ABC North West

News VOA .com

Business Wire: Pan African Commences Diamond Exploration Program; Establishes Sample Processing Laboratory

SMH.com.au: Diamonds, not gold, are Henry's best friend

PR Web: Mondera Sets New Jewelry Industry Shipping Standard

Shopping Brains: The Donald proposes with an Emerald Cut


Categories

Babies

Books

Chess

Cool Websites

Current Events

Diamonds

Entertainment

Gemstones

Jewelry

Miscellaneous

MT Tips & Tricks

Science

Sports

Technology

Wedding Journal



Archives

May 2007

August 2005

May 2005

April 2005

February 2005

January 2005

October 2004

September 2004

August 2004

July 2004

June 2004

May 2004

April 2004

March 2004

February 2004

January 2004

December 2003

November 2003

October 2003

September 2003

August 2003

July 2003

June 2003

May 2003

April 2003

March 2003

February 2003

January 2003

December 2002

November 2002

October 2002



Links

Connor Racing

Diamond News

Facto.org

Joho the Blog

Joi Ito

Mark Pilgrim

OverLawyered

Zeldman




Search






Credits



Movable Type




« Washington Daily News: A new interest in jewelry | Up a level | The Whispering Wheel »

December 26, 2003

Microsoft planning an excellent tool to fight spam

Microsoft has come up with the best anti-spam concept I've ever really heard. As long as they make it open source, this will be a tremendous help for the scourge of spam. Can't wait to see it implemented.


Posted by GilbertZ at 11:38 PM | TrackBack




Comments:

I still think this idea would be more effective if they combined it with a nationally funded anti spam website.

In all honesty how can we not justify the large savings for the small cost.

In addition a bayesian spam filter combined with the above two ideas would make spam unprofitable.

Posted by: depression blog on December 31, 2003 12:25 AM

The problem with filters is that spammers keep working on fooling them.

As for a nationally funded website, there are a bunch of websites that provided some excellent info and ideas. Many wound up becoming victims of spammers DDOSing them to death.

I'm not sure how a bigger anti-spam website would stop spam. It would just result in a bigger target and another "from" address for spammers to use. If you've never noticed how not scared spammers are of authority, they regularly use the FTC's email address for reporting spam, as the spoofed "from" address in the spam they send.

But the bigger problem with national funding, is that the government is not only ineffective, but they are corrupt. It took them so many years to finally sign a law against spam? At least you would have thought they'd get it right, but it goes against the very basics of fighting spam, requiring spammers to honor "opt-out" protocols. Everyone knows that "opting out" of spam is the best way to get more spam. So their message is a joke. And they didn't allow individuals to sue spammers, even overriding state laws that provided some relief in this respect. The current law they signed is offensive and disgusting.

Congress has followed the suggested protocols of the DMA, Direct Marketing Association, a powerful PAC. They don't care what "We the people" have to say.

Posted by: GilbertZ on December 31, 2003 01:05 AM


Post a comment:


























May 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

< Contact Us - Privacy Statement >

Copyright © 1997 - Present, DiamondRing.com.
All Rights Reserved.