Sign in or Register Home
DiamondRing.com Logo DiamondRing.comYour Online Jewelry Shopping Network  
 
View Latest Products View Posts Ask Us Ask our Network Jewelers for a quote on a diamond/gemstone/jewelry



Diamond Search













Recent Entries

DiamondBlog.com is back!

DiamondBlog is coming back soon!

A9 releases awesome map tool

The New DeBeers Store

50 Carat Graf Diamond

Mystery of Hope Diamond Solved

A Planet full of Diamonds?

Is Google developing their own browser?

Interfax: Yakutia boosts cut diamond output 150% in 9 mths

Interfax: MinFin close to declassifying diamond data

Express India: Diamond workers to get rating cards

IPP Media: Shinyanga turns into haven of illegal diamond trafficking

Diamonds in the news: Victoria Secret Bra

The Apprentice: Launching Trump's new Jewelry Line

BusinessWire: Wal-Mart number on Jewelry Retailer

iAfrica: Tiffany takes on DeBeers

StockLemon.com: “Diamonds are Forever”, but Stock Promotions “Die Another Day”

Jewelry Consumer Opinion Council

Ivana Trump: Jewelry Collection and Reality Show

TACY: LVMH WATCHES AND JEWELRY SALES UP 6%

JCK: Belgian diamond bourses launches quality label

All Africa: Govt to Finalise Memo On Gemstone Authority

Hindustan Times: The necklace that Joan Rivers wore for the post-Oscar 2004 party is now creating ripples in the city.

India Info Line: For large players like us the policy is neutral: Classic Diamonds

Stockwatch.com: CMKM Diamonds the subject of aborted radio debate

NPR: From the Kalahari to Malibu

The Journal News: Rockland jewelers make convertible jewelry

PR Newswire: Kensington Resources Ltd.: Aggressive 2004 Drilling Program Commences at Fort a la Corne

Tacy: ANDRE LOUW APPOINTED CHAIRMAN OF DIAMOND CORE

ABC North West

News VOA .com

Business Wire: Pan African Commences Diamond Exploration Program; Establishes Sample Processing Laboratory

SMH.com.au: Diamonds, not gold, are Henry's best friend

PR Web: Mondera Sets New Jewelry Industry Shipping Standard

Shopping Brains: The Donald proposes with an Emerald Cut


Categories

Babies

Books

Chess

Cool Websites

Current Events

Diamonds

Entertainment

Gemstones

Jewelry

Miscellaneous

MT Tips & Tricks

Science

Sports

Technology

Wedding Journal



Archives

May 2007

August 2005

May 2005

April 2005

February 2005

January 2005

October 2004

September 2004

August 2004

July 2004

June 2004

May 2004

April 2004

March 2004

February 2004

January 2004

December 2003

November 2003

October 2003

September 2003

August 2003

July 2003

June 2003

May 2003

April 2003

March 2003

February 2003

January 2003

December 2002

November 2002

October 2002



Links

Connor Racing

Diamond News

Facto.org

Joho the Blog

Joi Ito

Mark Pilgrim

OverLawyered

Zeldman




Search






Credits



Movable Type




« More on those annoying optical illusions | Up a level | Morgan's Jewelry in Kansas City, Robbed »

October 30, 2002

DMA finally see what the rest of the world already knows about Spam

One of my favorite topics here is spam and how to get rid of it. As I've said before on DT, the reason that legislation hasn't worked is because of a powerful lobbying organization called the DMA. They have opposed legislation for a long time. These are the folks behind junk mail and other marketing gimmicks. Even they have finally recognized the need for anti-spam laws. This reduces one of the bottlenecks to spam- somewhat.

The only reason they are realizing this is because with spam taking over, their own members' emails are getting lost in the noise and are therefore not effective. They are so blind and self-serving that they don't understand how useless their own stand is and how their power is making everyone including their own members suffer.

And their change of heart is still rather feeble. For they still want it to be legal to send unsolicited email. In other words, Opt-out laws rather than Opt-in laws. What does this mean? It means that the emails must provide a way for you to be removed from the mailing list.

Although I'm in disagreement with the DMA on this issue, their concept of opt-out is completely unrealistic even from their own worldview. No one uses opt-out anymore because all it does is validate your email address to spammers who will then send you more emails.

It is more than a little aggravating that our lawmakers are also so self-serving that they rather listen to a PAC like the DMA rather than what is obvious to any human being with an email address. Spam should be very illegal period. If the politicians need money, they can get plenty more than the DMA is offering if they would stem the tide of this scourge of the Internet.


Posted by GilbertZ at 04:54 PM | TrackBack




Comments:




Post a comment:


























May 2007
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
    1 2 3 4 5
6 7 8 9 10 11 12
13 14 15 16 17 18 19
20 21 22 23 24 25 26
27 28 29 30 31    

< Contact Us - Privacy Statement >

Copyright © 1997 - Present, DiamondRing.com.
All Rights Reserved.